Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Professors & MOOCs

As long as the expanding of MOOCs, debating about MOOC among professors never ceased. There are different opinions which mainly because the different roles that professors play in MOOCs. As we know,the professors who teach a course on MOOCs mostly come from famous and wealthy universities.On the one hand, the prestige of the universities and the professors is a guarantee of high enrollment of the courses; on the other hand, famous and wealthy universities have the strength to operate MOOC courses. However,the second or third level colleges or universities are hard to operate this kind of learning platform, because their relatively weaker academic and economic strength, and also their less prestige don't prepare them well to compete with famous universities in education on MOOCs. From this sense, the meaning of MOOC to these two general kinds of professors is different, which can be a reason for their debates.
As to the rock star professors, who are famous and popular on MOOCs, they obtain a new platform to spread the influences of their teaching and enhance their academic status.They choose to participate in MOOCs also because they are willingness to provide free or cheaper but high qualities learning opportunities for more students who have access to a MOOC around the world; they also want to stand on the leading edge of the educational development; and increase their visibility (The Minds Behind the MOOCs). Certainly, some teachers open courses on MOOC because of their superiors suggestions or command more than their own willingness. However, other professors who don't want to join MOOCs think that teaching a course on MOOC distract their attentions from their normal on-campus duties because preparing a course on MOOC needs a lot of time; and they thought it is a threat to professors' intellectual property (Threats); meanwhile, they think that professor who have real interests and vigorous attitudes toward education won't teach course like the way on MOOCs, which just using shorting lectures and some quiz; they highlight the interactions between teacher and students or between students in traditional education, and also personalized education which is impossible on MOOC (The MOOC Racket). Some professors don't support inviting MOOC courses into universities or colleges.From their opinions, it will threaten the normal faculties interests in traditional education. As ordinary faculties, they can't play a role on MOOCs easily, for the reason that the students on MOOC are centralized to famous teachers, the market to ordinary faculties is very limited.In order to protect their own interests and academic rigorous,some of them show definite objection to inviting MOOC courses into school.

In my opinion, if people invite a lot of courses provided by MOOCs into school, it definitely will influence some faculties' interests. At the same time, it also has influences on  professors' daily work in local schools who open courses on MOOCs. However, I believe that introducing courses from MOOCs to schools is not easy, because it will met a lot of conflicts. Professors who teach both in schools and on MOOCs have time conflicts which is not easy to solve; and their intellectual property faces threat;  the work they need to do for teaching a course on MOOC can't give them appropriate economic return at present; meanwhile, it must exist many professors who hold objective opinions toward MOOCs because of the shortcomings of MOOC and the problems it may arouse in the future, especially about credits awarding from it.












 

10 comments:

  1. Hi Yanyi,
    Thanks for an interesting, and entertaining, post! I think you make some good points about professors and moocs. Yes, some folks are embracing them. Some are skeptical. I'm not sure whether the skepticism is entirely out of self interest, but that may be a part of it in some cases (and maybe should be a part of it). The question of how best to use the resources we have to maximize learning is one that will continue to be at the heart of the debate, as will whether learning can (or should) be scalable. Cute video. What tech did you use to make it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comments! I used my ipad!

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your comments! I used my ipad!

      Delete
    3. Dr. Major,
      I agree that part of the skepticism is due to faculty self-preservation. I think this is a universal phenomenon that occurs in essentially all industries. As times change, technology changes the ways in which we operate, and that does involve a restructuring of old formats and systems. This reminds me of the Star Trek: Next generation I used to watch; resistance is futile!

      Delete
    4. I agree James, self-preservation and simple fear of change, as is common in human nature. Now, I do believe there are some professors who genuinely feel that tech of any kind, and especially something as foreboding as a MOOC, would infringe on their pedagogical principles.

      Delete
    5. First, loved the video Yanyi! I agree that change is always met with resistance -- the Change Monster. I believe also the resistance to what may seem to be more automated, canned courses comes when one realizes that non-tenured track is around 75% and some faculty on contract do not receive benefits such as health care. So, if you were one of those faculty in a contract-based, part-time position with no benefits, would you not be a bit resistant? I have really tried to put myself in both positions since I teach 100% online and have been use to the benefits of OL teaching. It can be daunting for a faculty member to feel that their students are higher on the curve than they are with the technology in a course. I feel some articles are a bit hard on those slow to adopt technology and just wanted to post on how they might feel. Perhaps they do want to use technology, but the training is not available on their campus. We need to remember that teachers have used technology in ways that it was not originally intended, so we are innovators. Change is just a slow agent no matter where one is as mentioned above.

      Delete
  2. Hey Yanyi,

    I enjoyed your video and I think you have some interesting insights into faculty interactions with MOOCS. You mentioned the possibility of administrators telling faculty that they must teach a MOOC, a situation we have not really talked about up to this point. If a faculty member is not comfortable from a pedagogical angle in that realm, I wonder about the quality of the teaching. At the same time, others would most likely jump at the oppurtunity to develop a MOOC format if given the administrative support.

    Jim

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoyed your video Yanyi! Do you plan to go back to China after you graduate?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you!! I plan to try to look for a job in America, and after I have work experience I will go back to China!But, I think it is hard to find a good job here, because my major has high requirement in language using.

      Delete
  4. Time is definitely a concern for professors who teach on campus and develop a MOOC. It will be interesting to see how administrators consider and factor this into the faculty workload. Another concern is the quality of the material. As one professor in the articles indicated, it is a full-time job. Because of the amount of time it takes to develop the courses (and complete other tasks related to teaching face-to-face), will quality be scarified? These things have to be considered as the discussion on MOOCs evolve.

    ReplyDelete